Time on your hands?
Mar 10
2010
Whoa. This must have taken some serious effort:
And in other news, Disney has decided to go for a more dude-friendly take on the ol' fairytale genre: from here on out (says the Los Angeles Times), they don't want to be "put in a box" by making movies just for girls. Because there are already so many movies out there aimed at females, and Lord knows we'd want to be fair.
And in other news, Disney has decided to go for a more dude-friendly take on the ol' fairytale genre: from here on out (says the Los Angeles Times), they don't want to be "put in a box" by making movies just for girls. Because there are already so many movies out there aimed at females, and Lord knows we'd want to be fair.
Posted by: Julianka
No new comments are allowed on this post.
Comments
Sheryl
Hah! That is cute.
Ehgh, I don't really want to think too hard on the Tangled Mess. I think that Disney took the wrong lessons from the "lack of success" of The Princess & The Frog. While I would like to see less focus on the Disney Princess line, I don't think that lessening the importance of Rapunzel in her own story is necessary or the way to go.
Yulianka
Right! I mean, why focus on the prince? What did he even DO in that story? Why couldn't he bring a @$*#$! ladder or a rope or something and get Rapunzel DOWN from the tower, instead of just trotting up there to "visit" her (and knock her up, at least in the version I read as a kid)?